Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Selection of VFQ Consultant by Using Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 24, 262 - 267, 15.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.903959

Öz

As technology advances exponentially projects are becoming more complex than before with the increase of uncertainty of circumstances. Companies have been looking for new methods, approaches, and strategies since the industrial revolution. Companies must catch new developments, adapt quickly with high quality in order to survive. Hence, agility became an important issue and a competitive advantage. Even though agility starts from software development, it spreads to all other industries. Agile project management takes place in organizations and aims to create a fast response project environment since time is precious. There are lots of agile methodologies and each of them has a different framework, rules, and roles that are changed by the trend of a new methodology. Nowadays, one of the new agile methods is Value, Flow, Quality (VFQ) that is formed by Lean and Scrum methodologies. It is a work-based educational method and aims to create a mindset and proper adaptation of an agile methodology. In this paper, VFQ is examined with its philosophy and benefits. Among three job applicants for finding the most suitable VFQ consultant for a company, the integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS method is applied.

Teşekkür

We would like to thank Tekin ÇETİNKAYA for sharing his vast knowledge and support on VFQ.

Kaynakça

  • Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 641-646.
  • Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M. S. (2007). Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science, Engineering
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management.
  • Telli, S. S. (2020). SELECTION OF OPTIMAL URBAN REFUGEE SHELTER DESIGN BY USING INTEGRATED FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY TOPSIS (Unpublished bachelor's thesis). İstanbul Technical University.
  • Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7-8), 783-795
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process Mcgraw Hill, New York. Agricultural Economics Review, 70.
  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29.
  • Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International journal of operations research, 10(2), 56-66.
  • Chan, F. T., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C., & Choy, K. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of production research, 46(14), 3825-3857.
  • Cebeci, U. (2020). SELECTING LEAN SIX SIGMA MANAGER BY USING TYPE-2 FUZZY AHP WITH A REAL CASE APPLICATION IN A LOGISTICS FIRM. Proceedings on Engineering, 2(3), 223-236.
  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247.
  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with applications, 39(17), 13051-13069.

Entegre Bulanık AHP ve TOPSIS Kullanarak VFQ Danışmanı Seçimi

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 24, 262 - 267, 15.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.903959

Öz

Koşulların belirsizliği de teknoloji ve diğer koşullarla birlikte artmaktadır. Şirketler, sanayi devriminden beri yeni yöntemler, yaklaşımlar ve stratejiler arıyorlar. Hayatta kalmak için şirketler gelişmeleri yakalamalı, yüksek kalite ile hızla uyum sağlamalıdır. Dolayısıyla çeviklik önemli bir konu ve rekabet avantajı haline geldi. Çeviklik yazılım geliştirme sektöründen başlasa da diğer sektörlere yayılmış durumdadır. Çevik proje yönetimi, organizasyonlarda yer almaya ve zamanın değerli olması nedeniyle hızlı yanıt veren bir proje ortamı oluşturmayı hedeflemeye başladı. Çok sayıda çevik metodoloji vardır ve bunların her biri yeni bir metodolojinin trendiyle değişen farklı, kurallara ve rollere sahiptir. Günümüzde yeni çevik yöntemlerden biri Yalın ve Scrum metodolojileri ile oluşturulan Değer, Akış, Kalite’dir. İş temelli bir eğitim yöntemidir ve çevik metodolojiye ait zihniyeti ve uygun adaptasyonu oluşturmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu makalede, VFQ felsefesi ve faydaları incelenecektir. Entegre Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi, şirket için en uygun VFQ danışmanını bulmak için üç iş başvurusunda bulunan aday arasında uygulanacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 641-646.
  • Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M. S. (2007). Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science, Engineering
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management.
  • Telli, S. S. (2020). SELECTION OF OPTIMAL URBAN REFUGEE SHELTER DESIGN BY USING INTEGRATED FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY TOPSIS (Unpublished bachelor's thesis). İstanbul Technical University.
  • Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7-8), 783-795
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process Mcgraw Hill, New York. Agricultural Economics Review, 70.
  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29.
  • Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International journal of operations research, 10(2), 56-66.
  • Chan, F. T., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C., & Choy, K. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of production research, 46(14), 3825-3857.
  • Cebeci, U. (2020). SELECTING LEAN SIX SIGMA MANAGER BY USING TYPE-2 FUZZY AHP WITH A REAL CASE APPLICATION IN A LOGISTICS FIRM. Proceedings on Engineering, 2(3), 223-236.
  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247.
  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with applications, 39(17), 13051-13069.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ezgi Kekilli 0000-0003-3100-906X

Ufuk Cebeci 0000-0003-4367-6206

Levent Sılay 0000-0002-1971-6530

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Sayı: 24

Kaynak Göster

APA Kekilli, E., Cebeci, U., & Sılay, L. (2021). Selection of VFQ Consultant by Using Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(24), 262-267. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.903959